1h staves (wands)
Old 08-15-2010, 07:38 AM   #1
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default 1h staves (wands)

We've all seen Harry potter, lord of the rings, etc etc. There are one handed staffs (called wands) out there! They arent really melee weapons in the least, unless you want to poke eyes out or hit people like a total flamer *flamer voice* "EXCELSIOR! I shall scratcheth thee!!".

Wands would have significantly less magic damage, 1/2 or less effects than 2h staffs with all magic skills. Obviously cater tanks would NOT be hitting for huge crits.

Just another build, diversity is what nod should be about, since graphics and hardcore gameplay is not Nods frontline selling point. Gotta sell something aside from the community of awesome poeple like me :P
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 08:21 AM   #2
Boss Hunter
 
Revanche's Avatar
 
Revanche is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Malachor V
Posts: 245
Send a message via MSN to Revanche Send a message via Yahoo to Revanche
Default

Dang flippy, you beat me to this idea. Since thd dmg would be non-existant, i think 60% of 2h staff bonuses would be acceptable, or a really high bonus but being unable to equip anything in the other hand (to prevent wand + sheild pwnage). Maybe a high cnc boost due to the focus through a 1h weapon.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 10:09 AM   #3
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default

yeah, need more choices
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 10:14 AM   #4
DickTwat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fully support. Would you be forced to use a shield with your 1h wand? Dual wield wand may get a bit... strange
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 10:27 AM   #5
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default

yes, shield ofc, like a caster tank. No real huge dd hits but the ability to last some time while casting.
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 10:33 AM   #6
DickTwat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It could make for some interesting fights between shield/melee and wand using DoTs
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 11:12 AM   #7
Boss Hunter
 
Revanche's Avatar
 
Revanche is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Malachor V
Posts: 245
Send a message via MSN to Revanche Send a message via Yahoo to Revanche
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick****
It could make for some interesting fights between shield/melee and wand using DoTs
Sounds excellent. I'd even give up the ability 2 equip a shield if i got a higher hit %, maybe make DEX a factor in casting with wands? I would jump on that train in a heartbeat.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 11:33 AM   #8
Epic Scholar
 
thatperson's Avatar
 
thatperson is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: In bed with Skred
Posts: 4,704
Default

ok i like the idea of wands but shields shouldnt be allowed or if they are autoattack should be disabled...for wands add a new style called autocast and have their damage based off of int...relatively high delays due to the gem bonus also...dw should be an option no matter how awkward it seems...the reason im against shields is casters are made for DPS its obvious so if they could tank it would only end in an OP class
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
There are modifiers that alter drop chance when you go AFK based on what you do when gone. We will list them here:
  • Fix and eat a sandwich +15%
  • Watch TV -5%
  • Urinate +20%
  • Finish your homework +10%
  • Stand on your head for 5+ minutes +33%

We believe these are working as intended.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-15-2010, 02:53 PM   #9
Seer's BFF
 
StormGuardian's Avatar
 
StormGuardian is offline
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: athens GA
Posts: 744
Default

This has been suggested a couple times before. I would love to see other options as builds, but iirc this one was shot down a while back, so I dont see it happening. :\
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2010, 01:33 PM   #10
yoky
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i think it should be more like 40% of caster skills or alternately just make a lot of the skills 2h staff only.

it would allow for hybrid build types like 1h crush and wand which would be fun
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2010, 02:30 PM   #11
Music
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is a lovely idea, as long as it wont make casters even more powerful.
  Reply With Quote

-
Old 08-17-2010, 11:58 PM   #12
Boss Hunter
 
orderr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 200
Default -

This would be best if the 1h staff can be combined with anything, creating lots of new builds.
Weapon and wand, double wands, wand and sheild, even wand and whip can all be used.
All require new stat builds.

It would be a lot of work to balance out the 4 new builds though.

Another idea: a whole new skill category that has skills that get more effective the less armor(including potions/runes) is worn. Not just for casters, you could play lightly armored variations of all current builds and you would have to figure out how little armor is the best option.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-18-2010, 05:11 PM   #13
Crab Defiler
 
clausewitz's Avatar
 
clausewitz is offline
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: spruce woods 3rd tree left, then 21st tree right
Posts: 70
Default

support

1H wand with shield,

but without dual wield cuz this would be strange
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-18-2010, 10:33 PM   #14
Epic Scholar
 
Smashbros's Avatar
 
Smashbros is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,174
Default

i dont like it.

think of it like this:

staves are classed as crush weapons.

now picture someone with a 1h wand, and a 1h crush (say the 89).

someone would have the benifits of the crush, PLUS the benifits of a caster.

**** that
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
However you want to spin it, buddy. This patch was specifically designed to somehow screw you over.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
Tell that to the crybaby archers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
We are well aware of the over-dramatic reactions to game changes in an effort to skew perception. It doesn't work, just makes them look like cry babies.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-18-2010, 11:06 PM   #15
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default

it's not a melee weapon really, about as useful as hitting someone with a chopstick. What do you think it's a tree trunk?
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-18-2010, 11:36 PM   #16
Epic Scholar
 
Smashbros's Avatar
 
Smashbros is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,174
Default

no im saying as a caster, you can train skills for the staff to use the crush benifits.

with this suggestion, they would be able to still get those benifits, plus use a real crush weapon with those benifits, PLUS cast still with the caster bonuses
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
However you want to spin it, buddy. This patch was specifically designed to somehow screw you over.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
Tell that to the crybaby archers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
We are well aware of the over-dramatic reactions to game changes in an effort to skew perception. It doesn't work, just makes them look like cry babies.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-19-2010, 12:05 AM   #17
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default

oh heck no. WAY to op. A wand would be a useless melee weapon, even moreso than a piercer :P
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-19-2010, 12:41 AM   #18
Epic Scholar
 
Smashbros's Avatar
 
Smashbros is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flipynifty
oh heck no. WAY to op. A wand would be a useless melee weapon, even moreso than a piercer :P
yeah but it would be used to help with casting, and then cause its 1h, you still have the other hand for a crush weapon.

could you imagine a capped caster, say san, getting like 60% of the casting damage he currently does (still crits of over 1500) PLUS using a 89 epic crush??
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
However you want to spin it, buddy. This patch was specifically designed to somehow screw you over.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
Tell that to the crybaby archers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitchless
We are well aware of the over-dramatic reactions to game changes in an effort to skew perception. It doesn't work, just makes them look like cry babies.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-19-2010, 02:09 AM   #19
Jon
Temporarily Suspended
 
Jon is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Beneath these waves
Posts: 1,104
Default

Good idea but I doubt Glitchless will invest time into figuring out the mechanics/code for this.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-14-2012, 10:22 PM   #20
Epic Scholar
 
flipynifty's Avatar
 
flipynifty is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,529
Send a message via MSN to flipynifty
Default

want
__________________


omg i wanna sammich nao
  Reply With Quote
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM
Boards live since 05-21-2008